What should the mayor of Boston look for in Wednesday’s debate? – Let’s See Todays News Updates

The two candidates will compete in the first televised debate on Wednesday night.

Boston mayoral candidates Annissa Essaybi George and Michelle Wu are set to fight in the first televised debate on Wednesday night, both of which have a high chance of winning ordinary voters who are just starting to compete.

For Essaybi George, Wu has more than 30 percent of the vote in September, a chance to blur the light in the media since he failed to get the approval of several major politicians.

For Wu, this is a test to protect and expand the coalition, which has given him an advantage over other candidates in the early stages of the competition.

WBZ political scientist John Keller will host the event. He said Essaybi George was “slightly at risk” as he was slightly behind Wu in cash and 11 percent behind in the primary.

According to Keller, these circumstances require that the task of Essayby George be twofold.

“By any measure, Michelle has an advantage. [Essayby George] has to do something to get her on the hook,” Keller said, adding that Essayby George should also make a good impression on ordinary voters.

Erin O’Brien, an associate professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts at Boston, acknowledged that Essaybi had a higher destiny for George, and said their first interview provided an opportunity to challenge Wu.

“It’s amazing that Michelle Woo has been in charge all the time, but there are also cases, but maybe [former candidate] John Barros didn’t push him in one of the [preliminary] debates. His policy,” O’Brien said.

“If you’re Annissa Essaybi George, I want to say, ‘Michelle Woo, it’s really nice to wake up, but it’s really important to adopt a policy that makes a difference,’” O’Brien continued.


As for Woog, O’Brien said the way to protect Essayby George from policy criticism is to follow his platform: . “
Jacketta Van Zandt, host of the Politics and Prosecco video show, disagrees that the stakes are higher for Essaybi George.

Van Zandt said, “They both know they need color feedback and are equally involved in these debates.”

If voters in color had previously backed former mayoral candidate Andrea Campbell or acting mayor Kim Jane, he continued, “Then we’re trying to figure out what these two candidates will bring to the table.”
“It’s not a problem for me to be a voter living in Roxbury, but it’s important for me to have an equal housing in Roxbury. I think that’s what the voters want. I want to hear about the salaries that make up. “

Joyce Ferriabo Bolling, a senior political strategist in Boston, was also reluctant to explain the debate as a higher risk for both candidates.

“After about 40 years in this business, anything can happen,” he said, referring to the 2013 election and appointing former mayor Marty J. Walsh.

Ferriabo Bolling said many expected Walsh’s opponent, John Connolly, to win.

“Some of the questions that really matter to me have not yet been answered,” he said, adding that both candidates would have to express their views on the Boston Public Schools School Committee’s voting questions and what to do about the admissions criteria for the controversial exam schools. .

Ferriabo Bolling, whose late husband was the first black president of the Boston City Council, said, “I graduated from Boston Public School and invested in me because I was my husband and my son.” “Our kids are mostly black and brown kids.

Essaybi George said he supports members to form a school committee appointed by the mayor. Wu expressed support for the hybrid school committee.

Ferriabo Bolling added that both women have to explain their plans, especially Wu, in a way that voters can understand, or risk making them look like they are speaking.

Pointing to the WBZ’s debate format, Keller said both women will be able to host Wednesday night’s debate.

In response to a question and a rebuttal, he said, “there is a maximum chance of going back and forth without wasting time.”

O’Brien said the candidates will create a different image because the two women are arguing with each other, but unlike the competition between male and female candidates, how they argue doesn’t have a significant gender impact.

“Studies of two women running against each other show that they run like men.” It’s still affecting women, but frankly, it was like that 10-15 years ago. “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.